Pre-post Disclaimer: Please note that I am speaking in general terms here. This post has nothing to do with any of my current personal relationships. It’s just a reflection on some events that happened in the past, not just to me, but to my friends. Call it one of my rare, pseudo-philosophical moments.
Please also note that when I wrote this, my brain was half-fried. So I apologise for any convoluted gibberish.
It’s a common phrase that usually comes spilling out during an argument.
“If you/he can’t accept me for who I am.. then tough/it’s your loss/*insert appropriate retort here*”
I am guilty of using this phrase from time to time – usually when I feel threatened and feel the need to sell the fact that I am indeed awesome. I am trying to eliminate this phrase from my vocabulary because truth be told, I have a real beef with the whole “If you can’t accept me” precursory statement.
I don’t like this phrase because it implies that acceptance goes hand in hand with automatic approval and forgiveness.
Which is bullshit.
I think real acceptance is acknowledging there is a discrepancy (for example, a difference of opinion or a clash in values) existing in a friendship yet still choosing to maintain a positive relationship with that person. It’s about agreeing to disagree while moving forward because you both believe that there is a greater good to be reaped from pursuing a friendship. In some cases, it’s about merely tolerance* but the best form of acceptance would be respect – to be able to say, okay, we are different and your take is still valid just as mine is. Heck, isn’t that what love is: to care for someone even if they have flaws which drive you completely up the wall? To show support for someone even if you disagree with their point of view?
The bigger issue I have with this phrase is the fact that it clashes with my belief; that if you want people to accept the way you are, you should return the favour in kind and accept them for who they are. It would be hypocritical to say that people need to live with your flaws yet show no attempt at understanding theirs.
And here’s the issue I have with the “If you can’t accept me” precursor - it comes across as an ultimatum. It’s forcing your terms on to someone. It reeks of arrogance. It is unyielding – take me as I am or else. Where is the consideration for the other person’s feelings and beliefs here?
I’m not saying that friendships never meet their end, in fact, sometimes they just have to for the sanity of both parties involved. My issue is with how they meet them – while I used to be the burn bridges kind of girl, I try not to be nowadays because I’d like to think that I’ve treated the people I interact with fairly. Because that’s how I want to be treated. Heck, doesn’t everyone deserve that?
And to use the – “if you were a real friend, you’d accept me” card is unfair. It’s emotional blackmail. Just because I don’t agree with one aspect of your existence, it doesn’t mean I’ll stop caring about you. To think that we can’t co-exist with our differences is just immature because it implies that my friendship is disposable and meaningless and it insults my emotional capability to handle things civilly and rationally.
Well, that’s my take on it anyway. And it makes me sad to think that even as we grow older, some of us just can’t handle things rationally.
But alas, emotions get the best of everyone and it leads to hasty, ill-thought actions.
And I just have to accept that.
—–
Edit @4.20pm: Had a bit more of a think. I think the only time you can use the accept me as I am card is when all of the following
- You have fully considered the other person’s point of view
- You are aware of your own faults – you are not proud of them, you don’t make excuses for them but you understand that you are human and infallible.
- You are trying to make provisions for said faults – to either be rid of them or exercise some self-control.
- You are saying this in a calm, rational situation. And not as a spur of the moment comeback.
Hmm. Food for thought.
—–
* I am reminded of a quote I saw on Kynne’s wall once
“Tolerance is, in our ears, an attitude you have towards something you believe to be wrong or inferior in some ways or towards something you generally do not like, but that you, for the sake of some other principle or value, are prepared to accept. While respect is an attitude that you manifest towards something you experience as equal or better than what you, yourself have; something you even think you might or can have something to learn from.”